Proton Calorimetry/Meetings/2025/01/15: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
** And ensure that raspberry pi in its case with heatsink when attached to lid with shock absorber doesn't collide with scintillator stack when closing lid | ** And ensure that raspberry pi in its case with heatsink when attached to lid with shock absorber doesn't collide with scintillator stack when closing lid | ||
* Quickest route to get scintillator sheets manufactured in shortest time is via John and Wayne in Wales | * Quickest route to get scintillator sheets manufactured in shortest time is via John and Wayne in Wales | ||
=== [[ELogs/SimonJolly|Simon Jolly]] === | === [[ELogs/SimonJolly|Simon Jolly]] === | ||
Line 49: | Line 48: | ||
=== [[ELogs/JoeBateman|Joe Bateman]] === | === [[ELogs/JoeBateman|Joe Bateman]] === | ||
* Investigating difference in dose-depth curves between TOPAS and FRED | |||
* Bragg peaks appear to match in plateau but not in Bragg peak and distal fall off (FRED has sharper peak and deposits more dose in Bragg peak) | |||
* Issue seemingly disappears when using mono energetic beam (150 MeV) with no spread - so likely to do with the way the code handles energy straggling | |||
* In discussion with Giorgio and Ilaria from Maestro to discuss issue | |||
* Continue to work on getting QuARC Geant4 simulation up to date and running. | |||
* |
Latest revision as of 12:59, 16 January 2025
Minutes for UCL Proton Beam Therapy Group Meetings, 15th January
Present
Joe Bateman, Sonia Escribano, Simon Jolly, Andreas Korn , Raffaella Radogna (via teams), Harry Barnett, Matt Warren
Raffaella Radogna
- Started filling wiki page for plans for test beam in Trento
- Received sheets of tuffnel material - whether there will be an updated CAD from harry - on how to proceed on frame for second prototype
- Will discuss with Bari mech eng to discuss drawings for second prototype designs etc
Harry Barnett
- Just QuARC enclosure windows left to design
- Wheels have been added in CAD
- Everything else pretty much designed - prioritise everything over the wheels
- Has discussed with Sonia to mount fpga and rasb pi to ceiling - but ideally add a shock absorber for the circuits
- And ensure that raspberry pi in its case with heatsink when attached to lid with shock absorber doesn't collide with scintillator stack when closing lid
- Quickest route to get scintillator sheets manufactured in shortest time is via John and Wayne in Wales
Simon Jolly
- Still waiting on harry for updated quarc casing and scintillator sheets machining before
- Harry can send raffy design for updated quart and enclosure to get idea for spacing
- If need can duplicate design with slightly larger case with slightly more longitudinal space
- i.e. design without breadboard but with two rails
- If need can duplicate design with slightly larger case with slightly more longitudinal space
- We have correct read back pattern from Oxford boards - DAQ readout chain is now working and works as designed and signal is much cleaner than before
- Can daisy chain 4 boards together and saw 4 read back patterns
- But 4 small errors on ddc
- Reset signal isn't going through buffer (I.e. takes input through Schmidt triggers)
- Upstream usb connector is 180degrees out
- Potential for ground loops on daisy chaining ddc boards
- Can't currently put photodiodes on board since the boards are missing sockets for them to slot in
- About 4 weeks turn around for Pete to update circuit boards and get them manufactured
Sonia Escribano
- Create new prod.sh for terminal based daq
- Look at what flags current shell script is pulling it out
- Try and make so that it doesn't require everything in a specific order
- Looking at live calibration data
- 10% difference between live calibration and post-calibration
- Post-calibration reads data twice
- Reverse options no longer working - but only clatterbridge board - but no need to worry about fixing since next clatterbridge module will be half sized ddc board
- Information window on gui being updated
- Higher priority for next quarc only beam test - what do we need that we don't currently have
Joe Bateman
- Investigating difference in dose-depth curves between TOPAS and FRED
- Bragg peaks appear to match in plateau but not in Bragg peak and distal fall off (FRED has sharper peak and deposits more dose in Bragg peak)
- Issue seemingly disappears when using mono energetic beam (150 MeV) with no spread - so likely to do with the way the code handles energy straggling
- In discussion with Giorgio and Ilaria from Maestro to discuss issue
- Continue to work on getting QuARC Geant4 simulation up to date and running.