Subsubsection 1.4.3: MC2H 100 vs Meta 100 Up Subsection 1.4: Correlations Subsubsection 1.4.5: MC2H 50 vs Meta (Meta900 prior) 50 

1.4.4 MC2H 30 vs Meta (Meta900 prior) 30

These are all the same correlation differences, but plotted at different scales. The sampling grid is 100 logaritmically spread.
(a) MC2H [Source]
figure plots/correlations_small/mch30corr100.png
(b) Meta Ann [Source]
figure plots/correlations/correlations_meta_ann/meta30corr_100.png
Figure 430 Correlation differences between prior at 100% max scale
(a) MC2H [Source]
figure plots/correlations_small/mch30corr20.png
(b) Meta Ann [Source]
figure plots/correlations/correlations_meta_ann/meta30corr_20.png
Figure 431 Correlation differences between prior at 20% max scale
(a) MC2H [Source]
figure plots/correlations_small/mch30corr5.png
(b) Meta Ann [Source]
figure plots/correlations/correlations_meta_ann/meta30corr_5.png
Figure 432 Correlation differences between prior at 5% max scale
 Subsubsection 1.4.3: MC2H 100 vs Meta 100 Up Subsection 1.4: Correlations Subsubsection 1.4.5: MC2H 50 vs Meta (Meta900 prior) 50