ELogs/JoeBateman: Difference between revisions
< ELogs
(→To Do) |
|||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
** Need to modify output so that it goes dose in 3D voxels as opposed to integrated z-axis and lateral mesh. | ** Need to modify output so that it goes dose in 3D voxels as opposed to integrated z-axis and lateral mesh. | ||
*** Voxel size? Same as TPS or larger? | *** Voxel size? Same as TPS or larger? | ||
** Distance from source to water phantom and size ion water phantom. | ** Distance from source to water phantom and size ion water phantom. | ||
** No. of histories per beamlet and no. of repeats per beamlet. | ** No. of histories per beamlet and no. of repeats per beamlet. | ||
* Eventually compare QuADProBe MC simulation to that reconstructed from TPS/DICOM values or TPS dose distribution using Gamma pass rate. | * Eventually compare QuADProBe MC simulation to that reconstructed from TPS/DICOM values or TPS dose distribution using Gamma pass rate. | ||
* After successful reconstruction with Geant4 start looking into FRED-MC download and using HEP GPU. | |||
=== Fibres === | === Fibres === |
Revision as of 12:54, 4 November 2024
To Do
MC Simulations
- Modify ProtonGB and/or ProtonSB Geant4 examples to start doing 3D dose reconstruction from UCLH beam test
- Need to modify output so that it goes dose in 3D voxels as opposed to integrated z-axis and lateral mesh.
- Voxel size? Same as TPS or larger?
- Distance from source to water phantom and size ion water phantom.
- No. of histories per beamlet and no. of repeats per beamlet.
- Need to modify output so that it goes dose in 3D voxels as opposed to integrated z-axis and lateral mesh.
- Eventually compare QuADProBe MC simulation to that reconstructed from TPS/DICOM values or TPS dose distribution using Gamma pass rate.
- After successful reconstruction with Geant4 start looking into FRED-MC download and using HEP GPU.