Proton Calorimetry/Meetings/2022/06/22: Difference between revisions
SaadShaikh (talk | contribs) (Created page with "== Minutes for UCL Proton Calorimetry Meetings, 22nd June == === Present === '''Saad Shaikh''', '''Simon Jolly''', '''Raffaella Radogna''' === Saad Shaikh...") |
SaadShaikh (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
=== [[ELogs/SaadShaikh|Saad Shaikh]] === | === [[ELogs/SaadShaikh|Saad Shaikh]] === | ||
*Conducted beam test at UCLH last week with rev. B and rev. C prototypes. | *Conducted beam test at UCLH last week with rev. B and rev. C prototypes. | ||
*Performed analysis and presented results in [this presentation]. Main conclusions: | *Performed analysis and presented results in [http://www.hep.ucl.ac.uk/pbt/wikiData/presentations/2022/SS220622_UCLH.pptx this presentation]. Main conclusions: | ||
**Rev. C boards could benefit from additional grounding. | **Rev. C boards could benefit from additional grounding. | ||
**Clear sheets between 5-6 times brighter than white painted sheets. | **Clear sheets between 5-6 times brighter than white painted sheets. | ||
Revision as of 09:42, 14 July 2022
Minutes for UCL Proton Calorimetry Meetings, 22nd June
Present
Saad Shaikh, Simon Jolly, Raffaella Radogna
Saad Shaikh
- Conducted beam test at UCLH last week with rev. B and rev. C prototypes.
- Performed analysis and presented results in this presentation. Main conclusions:
- Rev. C boards could benefit from additional grounding.
- Clear sheets between 5-6 times brighter than white painted sheets.
- White sheets produce poor results as in previous beam test – excellent fit results with clear sheets (after adjustment of WET of each sheet by approx. 0.1mm).
- Rev. C fits inconsistent, likely due to poor alignment of sheets with photodiodes.
- Will travel to Miami at the end of the week to attend PTCOG and present results.
- Will be on holiday after conference, returning to work on 13th July.