Proton Calorimetry/Meetings/2022/01/12: Difference between revisions

From PBTWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
Line 12: Line 12:
*Rev C boards currently not working: USB-C pin-outs swapped and similar problems with Molex. Marko currently working on fix for Molex.
*Rev C boards currently not working: USB-C pin-outs swapped and similar problems with Molex. Marko currently working on fix for Molex.
**Will ask Marko about high temperature on IC5.
**Will ask Marko about high temperature on IC5.
*Nikon images produced poor results – most if not all images saturated. Poor fit results even with shortest exposure time. Results shown in [ this presentation].
*Nikon images produced poor results – most if not all images saturated. Poor fit results even with shortest exposure time. Results shown in [http://www.hep.ucl.ac.uk/pbt/wikiData/presentations/2021/SS220112_Nikon.pptx this presentation].
**Future experiments should use exposure time of maximum 0.1s.
**Future experiments should use exposure time of maximum 0.1s.
**Will retry analysis with NEF images and by taking central stripe of image.
**Will retry analysis with NEF images and by taking central stripe of image.
*Will install GEANT4 on computer and try to fix visualisation bug through dedicated Qt5 install.
*Will install GEANT4 on computer and try to fix visualisation bug through dedicated Qt5 install.

Revision as of 16:36, 13 January 2022

Minutes for UCL Proton Calorimetry Meetings, 12th January

Present

Simon Jolly, Saad Shaikh, Jeremy Ocampo

Saad Shaikh

  • Submitted application for HITRIplus internships.
  • Met with Ruben to discuss April and November UCLH results.
    • Ruben suggested possible sources of ionising particles for after light-injection tests.
  • Package from NUVIA currently in Dartford – awaiting release. Contents unknown.
  • Rev C boards currently not working: USB-C pin-outs swapped and similar problems with Molex. Marko currently working on fix for Molex.
    • Will ask Marko about high temperature on IC5.
  • Nikon images produced poor results – most if not all images saturated. Poor fit results even with shortest exposure time. Results shown in this presentation.
    • Future experiments should use exposure time of maximum 0.1s.
    • Will retry analysis with NEF images and by taking central stripe of image.
  • Will install GEANT4 on computer and try to fix visualisation bug through dedicated Qt5 install.