Proton Calorimetry/Meetings/2021/09/29: Difference between revisions
SaadShaikh (talk | contribs) |
SaadShaikh (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
**±5mm in x-y plane for given z | **±5mm in x-y plane for given z | ||
**Range steps, no x-y scanning (demo live fit) | **Range steps, no x-y scanning (demo live fit) | ||
***Will investigate behaviour of live fit when detector is seeing darkness. May require some gating feature. | |||
**Box field treatment plan | **Box field treatment plan | ||
**Steer beam towards photodiodes(?) | **Steer beam towards photodiodes(?) |
Revision as of 11:48, 30 September 2021
Minutes for UCL Proton Calorimetry Meetings, 15th September
Present
Simon Jolly, Saad Shaikh, Jeremy Ocampo
Saad Shaikh
- Met with Raffy to discuss poster for IEEE NSS MIC
- Raffy to draft landscape version of poster and slides for video presentation.
- Will meet again to discuss recording of video.
- Raffy mentioned that we have a UV LED already, will look for it.
- Will take care not to dismantle detector after next UCLH beam in order to take calibration measurements with UV LED.
- Simon has heard back from Andy: UCLH beam test possible within next 1-2 months. Exact date TBC. Measurements to be made:
- Background & calibration
- Pencil beams, 70-110 MeV, 3 currents (high, low, very low)
- ±5mm in x-y plane for given z
- Range steps, no x-y scanning (demo live fit)
- Will investigate behaviour of live fit when detector is seeing darkness. May require some gating feature.
- Box field treatment plan
- Steer beam towards photodiodes(?)
- Will test experimental setup next week. CMOS sensor to not be used.
- Beam test at Clatterbridge likely to not happen until new year.
- Fern has provided headless Pi, will take home to test.
- Need to set-up static IP address in order to use WiFi.
- Probably easiest to SSH from Mac when using it.
- Looking into multi-threading for live fitting.
- Brief investigation into executing bash commands from webpage, this forum post may be useful.
- Discussed first version of Connor's stack design:
- Main issue is providing enough support for sheets of different sizes.
- Current method would require entire detector recalibration if a module is removed.
- Is there a way of securing 32 sheets in a gapless holder?
- Will reconvene with Connor to discuss feedback.