Proton Calorimetry/Meetings/2020/02/17: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
=== [[ELogs/SaadShaikh|Saad Shaikh]] === | === [[ELogs/SaadShaikh|Saad Shaikh]] === | ||
* he is able to fit real data using Laurent's code | |||
** all of the steps are included, quenched bragg fit and reconstructed curve. comparison with simulated distrivution is also included. | |||
* the range is always slightly underestimated | |||
** fitting simulated data, a small underestimation comes from the model | |||
** fitting real data, the underestimation is consistent with uncertainties | |||
* he tried data for measuring range withour PMMA absorbers and data with absorbers to double check the WE thickness of the absorber | |||
* the analysis includes Bkg subtraction and calibration | |||
* comparison of run 47 30mm vs 52 21 mm and dependence with beam size | |||
** the smaller beam has higher light output, but the difference in light output compensates at the Bragg peak. | |||
** will plot spot size intermediate steps to check the consistency of the measurements. | |||
* started implementing more object oriented way of implementing data. | |||
* he is interested in running geant4 simulations in the near future | |||
=== [[ELogs/RaffaellaRadogna|Raffaella Radogna]] === | |||
* | |||
=== [[ELogs/LaurentKelleter|Laurent Kelleter]] === | === [[ELogs/LaurentKelleter|Laurent Kelleter]] === | ||
Revision as of 15:11, 17 February 2020
Minutes for UCL Proton Calorimetry Meetings, 17th February (D17, Physics & Astronomy, UCL)
Present
Simon Jolly, Laurent Kelleter, Saad Shaikh, Raffaella radogna
Saad Shaikh
- he is able to fit real data using Laurent's code
- all of the steps are included, quenched bragg fit and reconstructed curve. comparison with simulated distrivution is also included.
- the range is always slightly underestimated
- fitting simulated data, a small underestimation comes from the model
- fitting real data, the underestimation is consistent with uncertainties
- he tried data for measuring range withour PMMA absorbers and data with absorbers to double check the WE thickness of the absorber
- the analysis includes Bkg subtraction and calibration
- comparison of run 47 30mm vs 52 21 mm and dependence with beam size
- the smaller beam has higher light output, but the difference in light output compensates at the Bragg peak.
- will plot spot size intermediate steps to check the consistency of the measurements.
- started implementing more object oriented way of implementing data.
- he is interested in running geant4 simulations in the near future