Plasma Wakefield/STFC Summer School 2022 Poster: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
FernPannell (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
FernPannell (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
||
| (7 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 37: | Line 37: | ||
|- | |- | ||
Driver Density: Long vs Short Proton Bunch | |||
= Driver | {| class="wikitable" | ||
!Run Number | |||
!Driver Description | |||
!Base Configuration | |||
!Window Width | |||
!Window Length | |||
! q/m | |||
!Total Weight (pC) | |||
!LCODE ampl | |||
!LCODE Beam Current | |||
!LCODE Beam Length | |||
!Beam Length (um) | |||
!Energy (approx) (GeV) | |||
!Comments | |||
|- | |||
|1 || Proton, short beam, shallow plasma || short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 10 || 0.00054 || 2045.504558 || 1.0 || 3.6 || 0.1 || 3.64um|| 30 || USE: PROTON-ANTIPROTON SHORT RANGE COMPARISON. Looks like it has a suck in region first. Good providing the next one does not. | |||
|- | |||
|2 || Anti-proton, short beam, shallow plasma || short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 10 || 0.00054 || -2045.504558 || 1.0 || -3.6 || 0.1 || 3.64um || 30 || USE: PROTON-ANTIPROTON SHORT RANGE COMPARISON. Blowout first shown, good. | |||
|- | |||
|3 ||Anti-proton, short beam, deeper plasma || short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 100 || 0.00054 || -2045.504558 || 1.0 || -3.6 || 0.1 || 3.64um|| 30 || USE: PROTON-ANTIPROTON LONG RANGE COMPARISON. | |||
|- | |||
|4 ||Proton, short beam, deeper plasma|| short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 100 || 0.00054 || 2045.504558 || 1.0 || 3.6 || 0.1 || 3.64um|| 30 || USE: PROTON-ANTIPROTON LONG RANGE COMPARISON. PROTON SHORT + LONG BUNCH COMPARISON. | |||
|- | |||
|5 ||Proton, longer beam, deeper plasma || short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 100 || 0.00054 || 2045.504558 || 1.0 || 3.6 || 0.5 || 18.16um || 30 || USE: PROTON SHORT + LONG BUNCH COMPARISON. | |||
|- | |||
|6 ||Anti-proton, longer beam, deeper plasma || short_bunch - DAC || 3 || 100 || 0.00054 || -2045.504558 || 1.0 || -3.6 || 0.5 || 18.16um || 30 || USE: PROTON SHORT + LONG BUNCH COMPARISON. | |||
|- | |||
Latest revision as of 08:37, 13 September 2022
Simulation of short driver bunches. Beams are defined directly within the configuration and beamfiles run through lem.py for diagnostics.
(LCODE configuration takes m/q, but resulting beamfiles are in q/m).
| Run Number | Base Configuration | Window Width | Window Length | q/m | Total Weight (pC) | LCODE ampl | LCODE Beam Current | LCODE Beam Length | Beam Length (um) | Energy (approx) (GeV) | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | short_bunch - DAC | 3 | 10 | 1.0 | -2045.504558 | 1 | -3.6 | 0.1 | 3.63 | 30 | Default DAC short_bunch.cfg |
| 2 | short_bunch - DAC | 3 | 10 | 0.00054 | -2045.504558 | 1 | -3.6 | 0.1 | 3.64 | 30 | Only change made to cfg m/q for protons. Ez plots for 1 and 2 are identical. |
| 3 | short_bunch - DAC | 3 | 20 | 1.0 | -2045.504558 | 1 | -3.6 | 0.1 | 3.64 | 30 | Plot x-range increases with window length increase. |
| 4 | short_bunch - DAC | 3 | 100 | 1.0 | -2045.504558 | 1 | -3.6 | 0.1 | 3.63 | 30 | Expecting Ez fall off with distance. Do observe this. |
| 5 | short_bunch - DAC | 3 | 100 | 0.00054 | -2045.504558 | 1 | -3.6 | 0.1 | 3.64 | 30 | Checking to see if Ez attenuation with distance is different for q/m=1/1836 (proton ). Identical plots. |
| 6 | short_bunch - DAC | 3 | 20 | 0.00054 | -2045.504558 | -1 | -3.6 | 0.1 | 3.64 | 30 | Can compare this with run 3 as mass not impacting currently. Identical despite ampl=-1 meaning should be opposite charge. Will set this directly in m/q next. |
| 7 | short_bunch - DAC | 3 | 20 | 1.0 | -2045.504558 | 1 | -3.6 | 0.1 | 3.63 | 30 | Despite setting m/q=1 in cfg, lem still shows positive and so results identical to run 3. |
| 8 | short_bunch - DAC | 3 | 20 | 1.0 | -2045.504558 | -1 | -3.6 | 0.1 | 3.63 | 30 | Keeping m/q as negative and making ampl=-1. Still no change. It seems (from previous knowledge) only changing the sign of the beam current in cfg makes a difference to m/q sign. |
| 9 | short_bunch - DAC | 3 | 20 | 1.0 | 2045.504558 | 1 | +3.6 | 0.1 | 3.63 | 30 | Return to run 3 parameters but set current to positive. Saying q/m is +1 still, but total weight is now positive, suggesting previous runs have been negative species and this is positive. |
| Run Number | Driver Description | Base Configuration | Window Width | Window Length | q/m | Total Weight (pC) | LCODE ampl | LCODE Beam Current | LCODE Beam Length | Beam Length (um) | Energy (approx) (GeV) | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Proton, short beam, shallow plasma | short_bunch - DAC | 3 | 10 | 0.00054 | 2045.504558 | 1.0 | 3.6 | 0.1 | 3.64um | 30 | USE: PROTON-ANTIPROTON SHORT RANGE COMPARISON. Looks like it has a suck in region first. Good providing the next one does not. |
| 2 | Anti-proton, short beam, shallow plasma | short_bunch - DAC | 3 | 10 | 0.00054 | -2045.504558 | 1.0 | -3.6 | 0.1 | 3.64um | 30 | USE: PROTON-ANTIPROTON SHORT RANGE COMPARISON. Blowout first shown, good. |
| 3 | Anti-proton, short beam, deeper plasma | short_bunch - DAC | 3 | 100 | 0.00054 | -2045.504558 | 1.0 | -3.6 | 0.1 | 3.64um | 30 | USE: PROTON-ANTIPROTON LONG RANGE COMPARISON. |
| 4 | Proton, short beam, deeper plasma | short_bunch - DAC | 3 | 100 | 0.00054 | 2045.504558 | 1.0 | 3.6 | 0.1 | 3.64um | 30 | USE: PROTON-ANTIPROTON LONG RANGE COMPARISON. PROTON SHORT + LONG BUNCH COMPARISON. |
| 5 | Proton, longer beam, deeper plasma | short_bunch - DAC | 3 | 100 | 0.00054 | 2045.504558 | 1.0 | 3.6 | 0.5 | 18.16um | 30 | USE: PROTON SHORT + LONG BUNCH COMPARISON. |
| 6 | Anti-proton, longer beam, deeper plasma | short_bunch - DAC | 3 | 100 | 0.00054 | -2045.504558 | 1.0 | -3.6 | 0.5 | 18.16um | 30 | USE: PROTON SHORT + LONG BUNCH COMPARISON. |