Proton Calorimetry/Meetings/2022/01/12: Difference between revisions
SaadShaikh (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
SaadShaikh (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
*Rev C boards currently not working: USB-C pin-outs swapped and similar problems with Molex. Marko currently working on fix for Molex. | *Rev C boards currently not working: USB-C pin-outs swapped and similar problems with Molex. Marko currently working on fix for Molex. | ||
**Will ask Marko about high temperature on IC5. | **Will ask Marko about high temperature on IC5. | ||
*Nikon images produced poor results – most if not all images saturated. Poor fit results even with shortest exposure time. | *Nikon images produced poor results – most if not all images saturated. Poor fit results even with shortest exposure time. Results shown in [http://www.hep.ucl.ac.uk/pbt/wikiData/presentations/2022/SS220112_Nikon.pptx this presentation]. | ||
**Future experiments should use exposure time of maximum 0.1s. | **Future experiments should use exposure time of maximum 0.1s. | ||
**Will retry analysis with NEF images and by taking central stripe of image. | **Will retry analysis with NEF images and by taking central stripe of image. | ||
*Will install GEANT4 on computer and try to fix visualisation bug through dedicated Qt5 install. | |||
Latest revision as of 11:16, 16 May 2022
Minutes for UCL Proton Calorimetry Meetings, 12th January
Present
Simon Jolly, Saad Shaikh, Jeremy Ocampo
Saad Shaikh
- Submitted application for HITRIplus internships.
- Met with Ruben to discuss April and November UCLH results.
- Ruben suggested possible sources of ionising particles for after light-injection tests.
- Package from NUVIA currently in Dartford – awaiting release. Contents unknown.
- Rev C boards currently not working: USB-C pin-outs swapped and similar problems with Molex. Marko currently working on fix for Molex.
- Will ask Marko about high temperature on IC5.
- Nikon images produced poor results – most if not all images saturated. Poor fit results even with shortest exposure time. Results shown in this presentation.
- Future experiments should use exposure time of maximum 0.1s.
- Will retry analysis with NEF images and by taking central stripe of image.
- Will install GEANT4 on computer and try to fix visualisation bug through dedicated Qt5 install.