Proton Calorimetry/Meetings/2019/12/10: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
**learning about non linear corrections from sensor comparing high/low well mode (high well mode is better) | **learning about non linear corrections from sensor comparing high/low well mode (high well mode is better) | ||
* He is updating the wikiData folder (wikiData/teaching/) with interesting presentations from medical physics classes | * He is updating the wikiData folder (wikiData/teaching/) with interesting presentations from medical physics classes | ||
* we had a first look at his slides for the Xmas meeting | |||
=== [[ELogs/RaffaellaRadogna|Raffaella Radogna]] === | === [[ELogs/RaffaellaRadogna|Raffaella Radogna]] === | ||
* presented first distribution reading EVM output | |||
* will wait Cosylab to provide a quote for the preliminary market research | |||
=== [[ELogs/LaurentKelleter|Laurent Kelleter]] === | === [[ELogs/LaurentKelleter|Laurent Kelleter]] === | ||
* Quenched Bragg Paper review | |||
** the simulation of the detector is not Geant4 validated model, so the comment they made is that the simulation has no meaning because not validated | |||
** the suggestion by Simon is to show the validation of the model agains measured light output, instead of geant4 simulation | |||
** will use Nov 2018 data | |||
Latest revision as of 16:07, 10 December 2019
Minutes for UCL Proton Calorimetry Meetings, 10th December 2019 (D17, Physics & Astronomy, UCL)
Present
Simon Jolly, Laurent Kelleter, Raffaella Radogna, Saad Shaikh
Saad Shaikh
- working with Laurent on the analysis of images
- learning about non linear corrections from sensor comparing high/low well mode (high well mode is better)
- He is updating the wikiData folder (wikiData/teaching/) with interesting presentations from medical physics classes
- we had a first look at his slides for the Xmas meeting
Raffaella Radogna
- presented first distribution reading EVM output
- will wait Cosylab to provide a quote for the preliminary market research
Laurent Kelleter
- Quenched Bragg Paper review
- the simulation of the detector is not Geant4 validated model, so the comment they made is that the simulation has no meaning because not validated
- the suggestion by Simon is to show the validation of the model agains measured light output, instead of geant4 simulation
- will use Nov 2018 data